- Is this new Internet annoyance the start of a trend?
Re: Is this new Internet annoyance the start of a trend?
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
And nor does it have everything .
It doesn’t have Fierce Wireless for example.
And in articles from that site in reader view, there’s a thing to register for an event.
Now I have actually tried to use the JAWS dictionary to tell it not to read that but I think the frames or where the content is changes. So the rules aren’t full proof so I turned them off.
main@TechTalk.groups.io <main@TechTalk.groups.io> On Behalf Of
Tuesday, June 22, 2021 9:59 AMTo:
Re: [TechTalk] Is this new Internet annoyance the start of a trend?
While I a;ppreciate NFB Newsline and use it off and on, separate is not equal and looking at something like the front page of The New York Times, and I would imagine of all sorts of other publications, is very different from looking at the publication with Newsline. I can look at The Times front page and see an aggregation of articles from the paper and features not in the print paper. I can see what articles the Times thinks are the most important because they are on the home page. In addition, the home page has a few editors’ picks articles that change throughout the day. Newsline has no equivalent for this very common way of looking at newspapers and magazines.
While I appreciate the contribution of Newsline, making a lot of publications available in a very convenient and portable form, it doesn’t alleviate the need for convenient access to the actual sites.
Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2021 8:42 AM
Subject: Re: [TechTalk] Is this new Internet annoyance the start of a trend?
You can avoid all this extraneous garbage by reading newspapers and magazine on NFB Newsline or by downloading magazines like Reader's Digest from BARD and therefore avoid their annoying web sites altogether.
On 6/22/2021 9:24 AM, Greg Daniel wrote:
I read READER’S DIGEST for years, but stopped when their articles were essentially thumbnail sketches filled with links. I wouldn’t mind if such links were posted at the end of articles, but as you point out, that doesn’t seem to be the way of modern journalism; after all, it’s all about catching the eye and attention of the reader immediately; after all, the reader may not read to the end of the article.
The New York Times recently has begun inserting sections in articles containing text and links to related articles, or articles in the same section that are only related by category, such as that they are all opinion articles. Here is an example:
This appears in the middle of an opinion article about Biden’s foreign policy:
OPINION DEBATEWill the Democrats face a midterm wipeout?
• EZRA KLEIN writes that “midterms typically raze the governing party” and explores just how tough a road the Democrats have ahead.
• JAMELLE BOUIE wonders whether voters will accept a party “that promises quite a bit but won’t work to make any of it a reality.”
• MAUREEN DOWD writes that Biden has “a very narrow window to do great things” and shouldn’t squander it appeasing Republican opponents.
• THOMAS B. EDSALL explores new research on whether the Democratic Party could find more success focusing on race or on class when trying to build support.
While I read other content online and haven’t seen an increase in this sort of thing, this could be the start of a new trend. Have others seen an increase?
Ways of eliminating intrusive content such as Edge’s Immersive Reader, don’t detect and remove these long sections. How do they look different to sighted readers? Does the difference in appearance give any indication of how these sections might be detected and removed or skipped by screen-readers or features like Immersive Reader??
Join main@TechTalk.groups.io to automatically receive all group messages.