|
Re: activating windoweyes
Gene
Not necessarily at all. The problem could
simply be that the person downloaded Window-eyes from the main part of the web
site. There is a specific link to download the version of Window-eyes that
runs for free when it sees Office on the machine.
Gene
----- Original Message -----
From: Ann Parsons
Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2016 7:45 PM
Subject: Re: [TechTalk] activating windoweyes Unfortunately, I think this is an issue for AISquared. you need to contact your local rep in Paris or wherever he's based. I assume Paris, but he could be anywhere from Renne to Marseilles. One doesn't need to be in a big city any more to work online. I never had any trouble with WE. It detected my Office 2013 and was fine. Ann P. -- Ann K. Parsons Portal Tutoring EMAIL: akp@... web site: http://www.portaltutoring.info Skype: Putertutor "All that is gold does not glitter, Not all those who wander are lost."
|
|
|
|
Re: Changing landline to wireless.
Pamela Dominguez
My phone service is through Cablevision, because it would save us a lot of
money. Sometimes there are glitches with it, but it is mostly okay.
Pam.
From: Gene
Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2016 1:08 AM
Subject: Re: [TechTalk] Changing landline to
wireless. Increasingly wired connections to the
phone company are being replaced by home phone service that uses the Internet
for phone calls. I'm not sure how much, if any, money, you save by getting
rid of such new service. You seem to think
there is some advantage to getting rid of the newer phone company service or not
switching to it but just getting rid of the old physical land line network and
not using the new service. This discussion is very unclear until we know
what is being discussed. Is that what you are discussing?
I recently switched to voip phone
service, as the new kind of service can be referred to, and I now have the rough
equivalent to the old physical land line service for a considerable saving and I
doubt I would save enough money to worry about by stopping that service. I
suspect that if I did so, and got an unlimited cellular talk plan to replace it,
that I would end up spending about as much money.
At some point, the phone
companies will get rid of their old lines network but they will still provide
the rough equivalent of land line service by using the Internet to send and
receive calls.
It's about the same as the old
line service was. The main difference is that the new service will use
your modem and if you have a power failure during an emergency, you will lose
service unless you have a battery backup for your modem and that battery backup
won't last for days of use if the power failure is a long one.
But cellular service is also very vulnerable to failure
during wide spread emergencies as well.
Gene
----- Original Message
-----
From: Carolyn Arnold
Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2016 7:42 PM
Subject: Re: [TechTalk] Changing landline to wireless. Internet runs through it's line. So, my plan was, I wanted to transfer my number to my wireless. I have all my numbers in contacts and wanted to eliminate that line. However, my husband had the other number, which we would have had to transfer to the main line where the Internet comes, and he did not want all the extensions and the announcements for his calls. Of course, we could have just taken down all the extensions and put his plain Jane phone on one jack. But, alas, as I say, as much as he does for me, goes out of his way to make life good for me, it seems to me not asking a lot, if that is what he wants. If I were alone, I'd just loop the net and say bye bye to land lines for the rest of time, since I think it is a matter of time that they will be a thing of the past for residential phones. The telephone company talked like we might be a couple of days without the net, so I am assuming that if I just left his line as is, took the main number, we'd still have down net time, and I'm not sure how much money that would save us after all of that. Bye for now, Carolyn -----Original Message----- From: Olusegun -- Victory Associates LTD, Inc. [mailto:ukekearuaro@...] Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2016 6:51 PM To: TechTalk@groups.io Subject: Re: [TechTalk] Changing landline to wireless. VoiceOver or Mobile Speak for a regular land line house phone? That wasn't the discussion as I understood it! I thought the desired action is doing away with a house phone, keeping the same number but having it ring on a cell phone instead? Isn't a cell phone considered wireless? Oh well, just in case I am wrong, a correction will be in order for my learning experience! Sincerely, Olusegun Denver, Colorado
|
|
|
|
Re: Interpol Scam
Armando <braille.bt4753@...>
So, I think that the email is a scam.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
---- Sent from a BrailleNote Apex BT32, Running KeySoft 9.5, Build 1280 -------------------------------- Armando: Admin/owner of the Technology For The Blind Mailing List, and the Blind-Chat Mailing List. Want to talk about the BrailleNote Apex and everything technology? Subscribe to this list that I had created to discuss the BrailleNote Apex and everything technology! To subscribe to the list, send a blank email to techfortheblind+subscribe@groups.io Note: The Technology For The Blind List requires new subscribers to be approved and email messages being approved or rejected. You can also subscribe to the blind-chat group I had created. This group is for general chat, which means that if you are blind, you can join this group! To subscribe, send a blank email to blind-chat+subscribe@groups.io --------------------------------
----- Original Message -----
From: Crist처bal <crismunoz54@gmail.com To: TechTalk@groups.io Date sent: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 15:19:55 -0800 Subject: Re: [TechTalk] Got An Interpol Email in my spam folder? So it's been pretty established at this point that unless you're jason bourne being hunted down by Interpole or some other international law enforcement agency, that this email is spam. Time to delete and move on... -----Original Message----- From: Rajmund [mailto:brajmund2000@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2016 3:03 PM To: TechTalk@groups.io Subject: Re: [TechTalk] Got An Interpol Email in my spam folder? hello,ifit was with GMAIL, it's certainly spam. anyway, through BASIC HTML. Want a link?.,,,, Sent from an iPad On 24 Feb 2016, at 10:59 pm, Armando <braille.bt4753@gmxcom> wrote: The spam was on my gmail account. I couldn't access it on the KeyMail Client on the BrailleNote. I can access it on www.gmail.com on the BrailleNote. ---- Sent from a BrailleNote Apex BT32, Running KeySoft 9.5, Build 1280 -------------------------------- Armando: Admin/owner of the Technology For The Blind Mailing List, and the Blind-Chat Mailing List. Want to talk about the BrailleNote Apex and everything technology? Subscribe to this list that I had created to discuss the BrailleNote Apex and everything technology! To subscribe to the list, send a blank email to techfortheblind+subscribe@groups.io Note: The Technology For The Blind List requires new subscribers to be approved and email messages being approved or rejected. You can also subscribe to the blind-chat group I had created. This group is for general chat, which means that if you are blind, you can join this group! To subscribe, send a blank email to blind-chat+subscribe@groups.io -------------------------------- ----- Original Message ----- From: "Rajmund" <brajmund2000@gmail.com To: TechTalk@groups.io Date sent: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 18:35:05 +0000 Subject: Re: [TechTalk] Got An Interpol Email in my spam folder? hello, sorry, thought it was only the subject, that we knew of. Sent from my iPhone On 24 Feb 2016, at 5:28 pm, Sylvia <sylvia0647@gmail.com> wrote: Hello, I'm really not sure that most people would have the knowledge or the desire to fake that kind of info when sending out an Email. -----Original Message----- From: Rajmund [mailto:brajmund2000@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2016 12:27 PM To: TechTalk@groups.io Subject: Re: [TechTalk] Got An Interpol Email in my spam folder? hello, just wondered whether it's a friend pranking or something. Sent from my iPhone On 24 Feb 2016, at 11:16 am, Carlos <carlos1106@nyc.rr.com> wrote: It is spam. There would be really nothing in the contents worth even being curious about. Just delete it and be done. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Rajmund" <brajmund2000@gmail.com To: <TechTalk@groups.io Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2016 4:03 AM Subject: Re: [TechTalk] Got An Interpol Email in my spam folder? Hi, What were the contents like? You can open it with the apex, as long as you don't click links, your account will not be effected, either. Sent from a BrailleNote ----- Original Message ----- From: "Armando" <braille.bt4753@gmx.com To: TechTalk@groups.io Date sent: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 18:04:33 -0500 Subject: [TechTalk] Got An Interpol Email in my spam folder? Hi. I checked my spam folder and I got this email In the subject, it says, "Interpol Confirmed The Truth About Your Fun." Is this a scam? Have you received these emails? ---- Sent from a BrailleNote Apex BT32, Running KeySoft 9.5, Build 1280 -------------------------------- Armando: Admin/owner of the Technology For The Blind Mailing List, and the Blind-Chat Mailing List. Want to talk about the BrailleNote Apex and everything technology? Subscribe to this list that I had created to discuss the BrailleNote Apex and everything technology! To subscribe to the list, send a blank email to techfortheblind+subscribe@groups.io Note: The Technology For The Blind List requires new subscribers to be approved and email messages being approved or rejected. You can also subscribe to the blind-chat group I had created. This group is for general chat, which means that if you are blind, you can join this group! To subscribe, send a blank email to blind-chat+subscribe@groups.io --------------------------------
|
|
|
|
Re: Changing landline to wireless.
Pat Seed
Hi,
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
I thought that it was just me being bothered by the sound of cell phones and skype during interviews and news reports. I really do not know how people could like using low quality technology. Not all cell phones sound terrible, but you have to be sure you have one that sounds tolerable. Blessings and All the Very Best, Pat
----- Original Message -----
From: "Pamela Dominguez" <geodom@optonline.net> To: <TechTalk@groups.io> Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2016 8:35 PM Subject: Re: [TechTalk] Changing landline to wireless. I don't know if you are old enough to remember when news actualities, those are the reports when they record something said by another reporter or somebody somewhere else, when they were recorded from over seas, had to be carried over shortwave radio. I think that's the way long distance calls were done, too. Anyway, my point was, you could hear the report fading in and out and all, depending on how good the signal was. Well, now, when I listen to people call up stations using a cellphone, it sounds like we are harkening back to the days of the forties or fifties. Some of the cheap landlines sound terrible, too, like the person is talking into a cup and it's hard to understand them. Pam.
|
|
|
|
Re: activating windoweyes
Ann Parsons <akp@...>
Hi all,
Unfortunately, I think this is an issue for AISquared. you need to contact your local rep in Paris or wherever he's based. I assume Paris, but he could be anywhere from Renne to Marseilles. One doesn't need to be in a big city any more to work online. I never had any trouble with WE. It detected my Office 2013 and was fine. Ann P. -- Ann K. Parsons Portal Tutoring EMAIL: akp@samobile.net web site: http://www.portaltutoring.info Skype: Putertutor "All that is gold does not glitter, Not all those who wander are lost."
|
|
|
|
Re: Changing landline to wireless.
Carolyn Arnold
Wireless, as in cell, cordless as in a home phone.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Bye for now, Carolyn
-----Original Message-----
From: Pamela Dominguez [mailto:geodom@optonline.net] Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2016 6:25 PM To: TechTalk@groups.io Subject: Re: [TechTalk] Changing landline to wireless. What do you mean by your wireless phone? Your cellphone? The only wireless ones I know of that are not cellphones are connected to a landline, and they have wireless phones that go along with the main phone. Pam. -----Original Message----- From: Carolyn Arnold Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2016 2:56 PM To: TechTalk@groups.io Subject: [TechTalk] Changing landline to wireless. Some bright person on the list gave me fair warning, that it would not be like I was thinking to make the change from the land line to my wireless phone. How right she was! Bottom line, it wasn't worth it. Best from, Carolyn
|
|
|
|
Re: Changing landline to wireless.
Pamela Dominguez
I will not like when landlines totally go away, but I suppose I will have to live with it. Pam.Original Message-----
From: Olusegun -- Victory Associates LTD, Inc. Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2016 11:37 PM To: TechTalk@groups.io Subject: Re: [TechTalk] Changing landline to wireless. I actually only have land line at work. At home, I have a DRY LOOP Internet service, no dial tone. Sincerely, Olusegun Denver, Colorado
|
|
|
|
Re: Changing landline to wireless.
Pamela Dominguez
I don't know if you are old enough to remember when news actualities, those are the reports when they record something said by another reporter or somebody somewhere else, when they were recorded from over seas, had to be carried over shortwave radio. I think that's the way long distance calls were done, too. Anyway, my point was, you could hear the report fading in and out and all, depending on how good the signal was. Well, now, when I listen to people call up stations using a cellphone, it sounds like we are harkening back to the days of the forties or fifties. Some of the cheap landlines sound terrible, too, like the person is talking into a cup and it's hard to understand them. Pam.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
-----Original Message-----
From: Veronica Kirk Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2016 10:02 PM To: TechTalk@groups.io Subject: Re: [TechTalk] Changing landline to wireless. The clarity and quality in sound with a landline is so much better than a wireless phone. Also when I talk with friends who are using a wireless phone, they are constantly fading out, sounding muffled and so often I have to ask them to repeat what they have just said because I missed part of their conversation. Veronica -----Original Message----- From: Carolyn Arnold [mailto:4carolyna@windstream.net] Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2016 1:56 PM To: TechTalk@groups.io Subject: [TechTalk] Changing landline to wireless. Some bright person on the list gave me fair warning, that it would not be like I was thinking to make the change from the land line to my wireless phone. How right she was! Bottom line, it wasn't worth it. Best from, Carolyn
|
|
|
|
Re: Virtual Recorder (new portable version)
Carlos
You're quite welcome. Hopefully some people will find this thing useful.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
----- Original Message -----
From: "Smiling?" <blind7@sbcglobal.net> To: <TechTalk@groups.io> Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2016 7:16 PM Subject: Re: [TechTalk] Virtual Recorder (new portable version) I grabbed your latest portable build to discover that it worked just as
|
|
|
|
Minor Virtual Recorder Update
Carlos
Both the installer and portable packages now
contain a ReadMe file. There have also been minor improvements under
the hood not really worth mentioning. Also this may be an obvious
point, but due to the requirements for making it portable, the
installer and portable main executables are not the same. In other
words, do not attempt to use the installed executable in portable mode. It
will not work correctly.
|
|
|
|
Re: Amazon Raises Free Shipping Minimum to $49
Cristóbal
The problem is that even though there may be a number of options for delivery, there's not going to be a way to accommodate everyone. This really isn't an Amazon issue per say any more, but more an overall issue folks are dealing with that their particular circumstances are making deliveries a challenge regardless of the retailer they're buying from.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
-----Original Message-----
From: Melissa Hammitt [mailto:mjmarney@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2016 3:27 PM To: TechTalk@groups.io Subject: Re: [TechTalk] Amazon Raises Free Shipping Minimum to $49 Well, pretty sure that is just an option. Using them for returns would be pretty convenient since you wouldn't have to go far out of your way and could go to a 7-11 for other stuff. It depends on the person, situation, and the product ... so whatever works for you I guess. I don't think that a package that size would go to a locker to be honest. A distribution or delivery center maybe if you don't want it delivered at home. Then again with that you would have to have someone able to help you get it home.... On 2/24/16, Gerald Levy <bwaylimited@verizon.net> wrote:
|
|
|
|
Re: Virtual Recorder (new portable version)
Smiling?
I grabbed your latest portable build to discover that it worked just as
you've described. Thanks for building and putting it up. From: Carlos <carlos1106@nyc.rr.com> Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2016 3:10 PM To: TechTalk@groups.io Subject: [TechTalk] Virtual Recorder (new portable version) I uploaded a new portable version that should work. The only caveat is that if you have UAC enabled, you will always receive a prompt because it requires administrator privileges to register the virtual capture device. Unfortunately, that is the best I can do for now since Enigma Virtual Box seems to have problems if UAC is enabled or in Windows 10 in general. Both the installer and portable version can be found below at the usual place thanks to Rob Hudson. http://opopanax.net/download/
|
|
|
|
Tandem Issue
Addison Gethers <o.addisongethers@...>
Hello All, I have jaws 17 and window10 on desktop computer. When I was trying to get FS technical support give me the tandem id then when I press enter then however I got the error message when the technical support heard the error message then he told me to spacebar it’s say controller closed can’t connected !! Tuesday gone Sherry from fs technical support try to see if we can get connects on tandem so she heard the error message so she think it could be the firewallor antivirus program could be blocking the tandem so she send me the e-mail so I can see if Microsoft can unblocked the firewall for me since I don’t how to unblocked from firewall ,so I call Microsoft the guy name Chris told me he unblocked from firewall he think !! So I call FS technical support right back to see if tandem is working on my end so the man give me tandem id when I press enter it’s still give me error message !! Does anyone can tell me how to go on AVG antivirus to see if it blocks tandem!! If AVG antivirus did have tandem block ,How to unblocked it ? Here is Sherry from FS technical message below !! Hi Addison,
If it’s a firewall, here’s info out of the JAWS help topic on tandem. You could let Microsoft read this so they could try unblocking the firewall if that is the problem.
Question: My Firewall is blocking the connection to the Tandem Center. What do I do? Answer: The Tandem Center runs at a well-known Internet address and port. The Tandem Center address is tandem.freedomscientific.com. The port is 12000. If Tandem Center is being blocked, configure your firewall to allow access to this address and port.
From: Addison Gethers [ Sherry
|
|
|
|
Re: Amazon Raises Free Shipping Minimum to $49
Pamela Dominguez
Are they the same people that were Jet Enterprises back in the 1990s, and that had a taped catalog they sent on a good quality c90 cassette? Pam.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
-----Original Message-----
From: Rob Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2016 3:06 PM To: TechTalk@groups.io Subject: Re: [TechTalk] Amazon Raises Free Shipping Minimum to $49 Cristóbal <crismunoz54@gmail.com> wrote: You could always give Jet.com a spin. Can't recall the free shipping threshold though. I was under the impression that jet.com wasn't terribly accessible. And in addition that they don't have very good prices.
|
|
|
|
Re: Amazon Raises Free Shipping Minimum to $49
Well, pretty sure that is just an option. Using them for returns would
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
be pretty convenient since you wouldn't have to go far out of your way and could go to a 7-11 for other stuff. It depends on the person, situation, and the product ... so whatever works for you I guess. I don't think that a package that size would go to a locker to be honest. A distribution or delivery center maybe if you don't want it delivered at home. Then again with that you would have to have someone able to help you get it home....
On 2/24/16, Gerald Levy <bwaylimited@verizon.net> wrote:
|
|
|
|
Re: Changing landline to wireless.
Pamela Dominguez
What do you mean by your wireless phone? Your cellphone? The only wireless ones I know of that are not cellphones are connected to a landline, and they have wireless phones that go along with the main phone. Pam.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
-----Original Message-----
From: Carolyn Arnold Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2016 2:56 PM To: TechTalk@groups.io Subject: [TechTalk] Changing landline to wireless. Some bright person on the list gave me fair warning, that it would not be like I was thinking to make the change from the land line to my wireless phone. How right she was! Bottom line, it wasn't worth it. Best from, Carolyn
|
|
|
|
Re: Amazon Raises Free Shipping Minimum to $49
Gerald Levy
The problem with requesting that Amazon deliver your packages to a nearby locker location is that if a package is large and heavy, how are you going to get it home? For instance, if you order something like a motorized treadmill which can weigh 150 pounds and it is delivered to an Amazon locker instead of to your front door, what are you gonna do? In my case, if a shipment I orderd is left with my super and it is too heavy for me to haul upstaires myself, he'll bring it upstairs to my apartment for me. Is the guy at the locker location gonna do this? I don't think so.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Gerald
-----Original Message-----
From: Andrew Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2016 5:59 PM To: TechTalk@groups.io Subject: Re: [TechTalk] Amazon Raises Free Shipping Minimum to $49 Amazon now has lockers. Which are located for me in most seven eleven stores. If you don't want packages left on your front door, Amazon will give you a code to get your package at one of their locker locations. They say it also makes it convenient to return items as well. Andrew ----- Original Message ----- From: "Matt" <matt.from.florida@gmail.com> To: <TechTalk@groups.io> Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2016 3:46 PM Subject: Re: [TechTalk] Amazon Raises Free Shipping Minimum to $49 Yes totally agree! Matt.from.florida@gmail.com -----Original Message----- From: Gerald Levy [mailto:bwaylimited@verizon.net] Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2016 5:28 PM To: TechTalk@groups.io Subject: Re: [TechTalk] Amazon Raises Free Shipping Minimum to $49 And lately, there is another fly in the ointment, so to speak. Fedex and UPS now have delivery services called Fedex Smart Post and UPS Sure Post, respectively, whereby Fedex or UPS picks up the package from the shipper, but instead of delivering it directly to you, it is first transported to a regional US Postal Service facility. The USPS then delivers the package to your home with a regional mailman if the package is too large to fit in your mail box or with the regular route mailman if the package is small enough to fit in the box. This arrangement just complicates the delivery process and makes it more likely for packages to get lost in transit, which is what happened to me last year. UPS blamed the Postal Service and vice versa for the lost package, and in the end, I never received it. Gerald -----Original Message----- From: Matt Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2016 5:13 PM To: TechTalk@groups.io Subject: Re: [TechTalk] Amazon Raises Free Shipping Minimum to $49 Yes it is nice to have tracking numbers but with USPS they tend to run behind on getting the tracking info updated . Most of the time it works out forme if it is Shipped by USPS and there is tracking number. But here again I don't live in a big city or even a town. I live way out in the country side. So it is a little different. Matt.from.florida@gmail.com -----Original Message----- From: Carlos [mailto:carlos1106@nyc.rr.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2016 6:31 AM To: TechTalk@groups.io Subject: Re: [TechTalk] Amazon Raises Free Shipping Minimum to $49 Yep, I've had packages which were completely lost in the system as well. A couple of times even when they claimed it had been delivered. I've also experienced packages simply being left out in the hall. Or claims of attempted deliveries which I know for a fact never took place. Granted, those experiences are not necessarily frequent, but frequent enough that there is definitely at least some laziness and incompetence involved if nothing else. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Gerald Levy" <bwaylimited@verizon.net> To: <TechTalk@groups.io> Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2016 6:19 AM Subject: Re: [TechTalk] Amazon Raises Free Shipping Minimum to $49 Absolutely not true. The USPS is so incompetent and inefficient that I often do not get updated tracking infornation until after my shipment has been delivered. Last year, they managed to lose two fairly large packages that had been shipped by Amazon which just vanished without a trace somewhere in their system, never to be seen again. In both cases, Amazon refunded the cost of the orders. Gerald -----Original Message----- From: Norman Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2016 5:54 AM To: TechTalk@groups.io Subject: Re: [TechTalk] Amazon Raises Free Shipping Minimum to $49 Hi. Does it matter? You always have tracking numbers and can find out where you're packages are. On 2/23/2016 1:54 PM, Gerald Levy wrote:
|
|
|
|
Re: Got An Interpol Email in my spam folder?
Cristóbal
So it's been pretty established at this point that unless you're jason
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
bourne being hunted down by Interpole or some other international law enforcement agency, that this email is spam. Time to delete and move on...
-----Original Message-----
From: Rajmund [mailto:brajmund2000@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2016 3:03 PM To: TechTalk@groups.io Subject: Re: [TechTalk] Got An Interpol Email in my spam folder? hello,ifit was with GMAIL, it's certainly spam. anyway, through BASIC HTML. Want a link?.,,,, Sent from an iPad On 24 Feb 2016, at 10:59 pm, Armando <braille.bt4753@gmx.com> wrote:Client on the BrailleNote. I can access it on www.gmail.com on the BrailleNote. ----Blind-Chat Mailing List. Want to talk about the BrailleNote Apex and everything technology?Subscribe to this list that I had created to discuss the BrailleNote Apex and everything technology! To subscribe to the list, send a blank email totechfortheblind+subscribe@groups.io approved and email messages being approved or rejected. is for general chat, which means that if you are blind, you can join this group!the desire to fake that kind of info when sending out an Email.
|
|
|
|
Re: Amazon Raises Free Shipping Minimum to $49
Oh, hey, that sounds pretty cool. I knew about amazon delivery
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
centers, but I didn't know about lockers in a 7-11. That's pretty cool, I hope I won't ever need to use them, but it is nice to know that option is probably out there.
On 2/24/16, Andrew <edrew@cox.net> wrote:
Amazon now has lockers. Which are located for me in most seven eleven
|
|
|
|
Re: Got An Interpol Email in my spam folder?
Rajmund <brajmund2000@...>
hello,ifit was with GMAIL, it's certainly spam. anyway, through BASIC HTML. Want a link?.,,,,
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Sent from an iPad
On 24 Feb 2016, at 10:59 pm, Armando <braille.bt4753@gmx.com> wrote:
|
|
|