Good morning what is ID Pro I did a search for in the App Store and didn't see it I'm curious and then maybe I can help you thanks

On Aug 28, 2020, at 07:28, Joe Giovanelli <joegio100@gmail.com> wrote:

?Good morning,

I have two questions:

1. Is there a list for Iphone users?

I have Eye-d Pro on my Iphone. When it opens, there is loud music which is much louder than the voiceover speech.

Is there a way to turn off the music?

Thank you for your thoughts.

Joe Giovanellli, W2PVY

On Aug 28, 2020, at 07:28, Joe Giovanelli <joegio100@gmail.com> wrote:

Good morning,

I have two questions:

1. Is there a list for Iphone users?

I have Eye-d Pro on my Iphone. When it opens, there is loud music which is much louder than the voiceover speech.

Is there a way to turn off the music?

Thank you for your thoughts.

Joe Giovanellli, W2PVY

Hi all, I am running jaws 2020 and windows ten. Thanks. Jim        

Speaking of Power Drain, I've been curious, what sort of Power does an I7 chip with a 500 watt power supply require? 

Which draws more, the Computer, or the refrigerator?

Grumpy Dave

Good afternoon, mechanical hard drives, you make a case! Not only is there a large current draw for startup, but you are essentially rolling on dry bearings for a few revolutions until their floating design puts the platter spindle airborne.

 

During boot up the head rack also gets a good workout.

 

I'm all SSD here, but my avarice kicks in when viewing the monthly electric bill. So I still turn my computers off, at least, most of the time.

 

Geoff

 

From: Brian Vogel

Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2020 12:20 PM

To: main@TechTalk.groups.io

Subject: Re: [TechTalk] respecting leaving computers on, or not

 

Geoff,

          I don't think that most of us think of LEDs as "light bulbs" in the conventional sense, and you're 100% correct on the difference between them and incandescents, which is what was being referred to at the time that quotation was written.  True LED bulbs are a very recent thing as far as consumer lighting in traditional screw-in bulb form goes.

           Until and unless computers are all using SSDs, the biggest stress on HDDs is generally at boot time.  So computers do tend to "pop" when turned off and on far more often than when in continuous use.  Unfortunately, I still see that all the time.   Almost all of my service calls for dead machines are secondary to either power supply failure or HDD failure that comes when the owner tries to power up their machine.  There's no way of knowing whether the failure occurred during the previous power down, or the actual power up, but it's one of the two.

            The issue of power savings is a thing of its own, and does deserve consideration.
--

Brian - Windows 10 Pro, 64-Bit, Version 2004, Build 19041  

Always remember that computers are just glorified light bulbs - they rarely fail in continuous use and usually go pop when turned off and on.

        ~ Technician with the username Computer Bloke, on Technibble.com

Good afternoon, mechanical hard drives, you make a case! Not only is there a large current draw for startup, but you are essentially rolling on dry bearings for a few revolutions until their floating design puts the platter spindle airborne.

 

During boot up the head rack also gets a good workout.

 

I'm all SSD here, but my avarice kicks in when viewing the monthly electric bill. So I still turn my computers off, at least, most of the time.

 

Geoff

 

From: Brian Vogel

Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2020 12:20 PM

To: main@TechTalk.groups.io

Subject: Re: [TechTalk] respecting leaving computers on, or not

 

Geoff,

          I don't think that most of us think of LEDs as "light bulbs" in the conventional sense, and you're 100% correct on the difference between them and incandescents, which is what was being referred to at the time that quotation was written.  True LED bulbs are a very recent thing as far as consumer lighting in traditional screw-in bulb form goes.

           Until and unless computers are all using SSDs, the biggest stress on HDDs is generally at boot time.  So computers do tend to "pop" when turned off and on far more often than when in continuous use.  Unfortunately, I still see that all the time.   Almost all of my service calls for dead machines are secondary to either power supply failure or HDD failure that comes when the owner tries to power up their machine.  There's no way of knowing whether the failure occurred during the previous power down, or the actual power up, but it's one of the two.

            The issue of power savings is a thing of its own, and does deserve consideration.
--

Brian - Windows 10 Pro, 64-Bit, Version 2004, Build 19041  

Always remember that computers are just glorified light bulbs - they rarely fail in continuous use and usually go pop when turned off and on.

        ~ Technician with the username Computer Bloke, on Technibble.com

I followed David's instructions, and they did lead me to his address. It started a new email, so I had to include a subject. I feel like I have been freed from tyranny by Brian and David, because now, in the rare event I want to take something off list, I have the freedom to do so.

-----Original Message-----
From: main@TechTalk.groups.io [mailto:main@TechTalk.groups.io] On Behalf Of Gene
Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2020 6:45 PM
To: main@TechTalk.groups.io
Subject: Re: [TechTalk] Question: How to Reply To the Original Sender Of a Groups.io Message Using Outlook 365

It would be interesting to see if others, still using 68.x have the same behavior as I do

I found something interesting in Thunderbird. One way to send a message to the sender is the following:
Open the message.
Tab once.
Start shift tabbing. After a number of shift tabs, you will get to the name and address of the sender.
Open the context menu. One of the items is copy name and address to the clipboard.
Press enter. Now, start a new message and paste the name and address into the clipboard. That method is faster than the one I discussed before. It isn't that efficient, but it isn't bad.

Gene
-----Original Message-----
From: David Goldfield
Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2020 4:10 PM
To: main@TechTalk.groups.io
Subject: Re: [TechTalk] Question: How to Reply To the Original Sender Of a
Groups.io Message Using Outlook 365

I'm using TB 78.2. As another user reported the option to reply to
sender is placing the list address in the to: field.


David Goldfield,
Blindness Assistive Technology Specialist
JAWS Certified, 2019

https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.davidgoldfield.org%2F&;data=02%7C01%7C%7Cd8c1e4f51d844be747b808d84ae67f1e%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637341701113425650&amp;sdata=XQeQbn7qBjIzTEXQKQhK2zMxGaD%2FsY1%2BDhacpaGE%2Bgs%3D&amp;reserved=0

On 8/27/2020 3:18 PM, Gene wrote:

When I tested reply to sender earlier today with Thunderbird, it inserted
the sender's address. I don't know why you got a different result. While
I doubt this is the case, if you are using a more current version than I
am, the function of the setting may have changed. I have 68.x on my
machine. Its unlikely this feature would have been changed but you never
know.

Gene
-----Original Message----- From: Norman
Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2020 2:06 PM
To: main@TechTalk.groups.io
Subject: Re: [TechTalk] Question: How to Reply To the Original Sender Of a
Groups.io Message Using Outlook 365



Well, I guess i was wrong on that again, i'll shut up and go hide in my
little whole again. :smile:

TB does indeed have the reply to sender option but it inserts the list
address. For some reason i thought earlier that it worked as i said it
did. It should be possible to make it do so by using the correct email
headers but that's a groups.io issue and not ms.

Just for the record, i still think ms should quit making email clients.




Thanks.







On 8/27/2020 2:59 PM, Brian Vogel wrote:
On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 02:43 PM, Norman wrote:
I declare if we all used tb the world would be a better place. Seems to me
that there would have to be a reply to sender option somewhere in
outlook/win mail, but i guess i could be wrong about the ability for ms
programers to think clearly anymore.-
This has nothing to do with Microsoft. The way groups.io sends out
messages, by design, is such that the reply-to address is for the group.
You would never want the sender's address to be the default on a mailing
list, or traffic would end up being diverted off-list almost constantly.
If you show the entire original message you can find the original sender's
address, but it's not in Reply-To.

This isn't limited to groups.io groups, either. Freelists.org and others
use precisely the same mechanism. Replies using reply or reply all
generally default to list, not sender.

When I tested reply to sender earlier today with Thunderbird, it inserted
the sender's address. I don't know why you got a different result. While
I doubt this is the case, if you are using a more current version than I
am, the function of the setting may have changed. I have 68.x on my
machine. Its unlikely this feature would have been changed but you never
know.

Gene
-----Original Message----- From: Norman
Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2020 2:06 PM
To: main@TechTalk.groups.io
Subject: Re: [TechTalk] Question: How to Reply To the Original Sender Of a
Groups.io Message Using Outlook 365



Well, I guess i was wrong on that again, i'll shut up and go hide in my
little whole again. :smile:

TB does indeed have the reply to sender option but it inserts the list
address. For some reason i thought earlier that it worked as i said it
did. It should be possible to make it do so by using the correct email
headers but that's a groups.io issue and not ms.

Just for the record, i still think ms should quit making email clients.




Thanks.







On 8/27/2020 2:59 PM, Brian Vogel wrote:
On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 02:43 PM, Norman wrote:
I declare if we all used tb the world would be a better place. Seems to me
that there would have to be a reply to sender option somewhere in
outlook/win mail, but i guess i could be wrong about the ability for ms
programers to think clearly anymore.-
This has nothing to do with Microsoft. The way groups.io sends out
messages, by design, is such that the reply-to address is for the group.
You would never want the sender's address to be the default on a mailing
list, or traffic would end up being diverted off-list almost constantly.
If you show the entire original message you can find the original sender's
address, but it's not in Reply-To.

This isn't limited to groups.io groups, either. Freelists.org and others
use precisely the same mechanism. Replies using reply or reply all
generally default to list, not sender.